Effective Writing

NameCourseUniversityTutorDatePeer Review Feedback FormThe author uses rhetorical questions to introduce different preventative into the . I find this interesting as it ensures that the reader s thoughts ar provoked along the writer s line of thinkingThe writer lacks a captivating introduction . He fails to schema briefly the expectations and purpose of the making the to be incoherent . The conclusion too fails to offset out the key shows raised in the and does non capture the stalling clear , or the tangible reasons behind his firm cubicleThere be a number of confusing sentences in this text chance variable , cause by grammatic , punctuation and spelling mistakes . In the last divide of first page , the writer nones Nicolas raise takes about a boy from California there is wonder of whether effect is a per sons name as it is not capitalized . Takes is also used alternatively of talks . There is a grammatical mistake withal in the last paragraph of the quarter page . It is indite , most religious see prone an organ is sacrifice the tense in this sentence does not agree with the verbs used , given is used in show of givingThesis StatementIntroductionArgument forPoint 1SupportPoint 2SupportPoint 3SupportArguments againstPoint 1Point 2Arguments to counter the arguments againstPoint 1Point 2Re financial statement of the dissertationConclusionThe lacks in a strong dissertation statement and a puritanical introduction The writer does not constitute the s stand but starts with an incoherent introduction hence goes on to outline the chronological history of organ interchanges . The mise en scene of the is not presented and it is preferably difficult for the reader to picture what question the writer was tackling . The direct about the writer donating his /her organs upon d eath is repeated twice in the . This repea! ting is by script after word and is unnecessary .

A repetition in a text should only appear when a writer wants to emphasize a point and should not be in the same address as in the in a higher place caseThe writer fails to introduce the scope of the and hence doesn t outline the point to the tackled . No promises on some(prenominal) point are then make that are not discussed . For the logical flow of the writer s ideas , they should be presented in a coherent sequence where the arguments for donor transplants are presented first followed by the refutations and the counter refutations . The should be re-organized to make it to a greater extent presentable and telling . The writer should include a thesis statement that clearly captures the stand on donor transplant . The conclusion should as well contain a restatement of the thesis and brief summary of the study points . At the introduction , the key points and arguments should be stated followed by the arguments againstThe of the was interesting but the create verbally skills are below the expectations . The writer should make an effort of up on the spelling...If you want to array a full essay, dedicate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay